Cerro Situacion

  • Cerro Situacion
  • 2250 m
  • Prominence 1610 m
  • Location: South 42.95581, West 071.66169
  • Difficulty: YDS class 4
  • Attempted: January 11, 2025

Information:


How to get there:
The nearest town is Esquel. From here to the national park entrance takes about 35 minutes by car. There is a formal park entrance with a gate and ranger station. A single day entry ticket is about USD 30. A new entry the next day is discounted 50 percent.
The trailhead is only a couple of kilometer after the park entrance. This location is at near 600 meter of elevation, S42.95483, W71.59425.
Route description:
The route follows a fairly well marked trail called Sendero Cocinero, from the road and up into a nice high bowl at elevation 1480 meter with location S42.95768, W71.63669. A main issue with this trail is that it may be closed by the park rangers. The information posted says that a permit is mandatory. However, such a permit is likely impossible if the trail is closed.
When you arrive in the bowl, turn left and ascend the slope. It is fairly easy to pick the best route to the terrain higher up. After an initial ascent on grass, the route enters a gully, the lower part of which has some YDS class 3 scrambling. Above this slightly steeper section, but well below the horizon crest, turn left and do a long, horizontal traverse left. The first goal is to reach a col on the main crest, ascending a little near the end of this traverse will get you to this location, elevation about 1800 meter.
Turn the ridge and continue with a slightly descending (descend about 50 meter) traverse. The mountain with the summit area comes into view for the first time. The terrain here is talus, quite loose and unpleasant in some (shorter) sections. After completing this, the route moves onto a mix of rocks and patches of snow. Ascend to near a new col on the main crest with elevation near 1940 meter. (location: S42.95564, W71.65063) The upper part of this ascent is on a glacier, but the slope is quite moderate.
Next, do a traverse near the upper side of the glacier. A possibility would be to traverse as far as possible, then access the rock and climb to new main col on the crest. However, this looked hard and we ascended the snow that extended pretty high well before that location. There is a deep crevasse (bergshrund) separating the glacier from the rock. Care is needed, when we were there, the uppermost tongue of the glacier touched the rock. This location made it possible to get onto the rock in a safe way. From here, a slightly outward sloping rock ramp provides access to the main crest. There is friction here, but also exposure. When wet things may be more unpleasant. A 30 meter (YDS class 4) pitch will get you to the main ridge. There is a rappell anchor attached around a solid rock pinnacle up here. This shows that this route has been used before our arrival.
The remaining part of this route has not been explored. The first part looks like continuous scramble. Then a possibly more difficult part in order to (possibly?) access the final snow slope leading to the summit. See comments below.
A track is posted on Peakbagger.
Comments:
We stayed in Esquel, but drove to the park entrance in the afternoon in order to explore the access. Pretty expensive (for being Argentina) to visit this park. We learned that the access trail was closed. We told them that we would continue our visit the next day and were informed that we would get half price admission for the following days (usd 15).
We drove to the lake and looked at possible trailheads along the way. It is unfortunate that there is a trend in many countries to make access to local peaks increasingly more buraucratic and complex. When you travel from Norway all the way to Patagonia in order to climb several mountains, there is no option to just follow local regulations that would spoil the entire trip.
The next morning, the park entrance area was empty, we could drive in without any additional ticket. We parked a few hundred meter from the trailhead and hiked partway along a local road. After crossing the river we eventually hit the Cocinero trail and decided that we should follow this "pretty nice trail".
We continued uphill following the trail, higher up, we cross the creek and ascend a hillside in order to bypass a problem area higher up. Next, the trail continued into the lower part of the small valley that leads to the upper basin. We arrived in the nice basin and knew that the remaining part of the route would be more difficult and challenging.
Ascending up to the area below the main crest went fairly well. The traverse left was easy, but perhaps longer than expected. We turned the main crest and immediately observed that the next traverse across steep and unstable talus would be less pleasant. However, we made steady progress across, then uphill on much better terrain including a final snowslope to reach a new and higher col on the main crest.
A big tower on the crest did not look easy to pass. It seemed pretty clear that traversing high on the small glacier, below the main ridge would be most reasonable. The challenge would be to find a way back up on the main crest. As close to the final summit as possible. We therefore traversed all the way across. It was difficult to make a good judgement of the rock before we got there. It did not look impossible, but certainly steep rock. After giving the rock a careful look, we both agreed that we should explore a possible alternative access point.
We descended back down on the glacier, then ascended up and onto a tongue that went quite high. The bergschrund (more precisely, the gap between the glacier and the tock) was nontrivial and very dangerous. We continued towards the highest snow with considerable caution. Fortunately, the snow connected to the rock right there, with a deep crack on either side. Moreover, a rock ramp provided a possible route to the main crest. The ramp looked fairly easy, but the exposure was not a nice view. We decided to rope up, then Michael led a 30 meter pitch all the way to the main ridge. We only had a 30 meter rope, so rappelling safely back would require some more thinking.
Unfortunately, the route ahead looked non-trivial. In particular, how to reach the final snow slope was very unclear. Some black clouds were also coming our way. Time for some critical decisions. A pretty large anchor for rappelling had been established right where we had arrived. Thus, we now knew that a previous ascent had used this same route. The time was around 1300, it had taken us about 3 hours from the upper basin to here. At least one more hour to reach the summit. It would have been fun and very interesting to continue exploring this last part of the route. However, the decision to turn back was fairly obvious.
I absailed back down on a single rope. A bit more than half-way down, I stopped and attached a sling to the rock in order for Michael to have some safety near where his 15 meter rappell would end. I got myself safely back onto the glacier while watching Michael getting safely down. He made several tries to get the rope to detach the sling, but without success. I told him to leave it behind. We next reversed our route back to the basin. The clouds kept their promise and it started to rain.
Still a long way back down to our truck. The rain stopped and we were making good progress. Back around 1830, our trip had taken almost 12 hours. Thanks to my partner Michael for great company.

Resources: